|
|
Post by tangerinedream on Jan 7, 2024 11:46:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by chipbarm on Jan 7, 2024 11:49:00 GMT
I presume this is why he wasn't included yesterday in case he gets injured and scuppers a deal. I doubt he'd have put much effort in. I imagine once a compromise offer is made that he'll be off. A promotion chase obviously sounds far more enticing than a relegation fight.
|
|
mat1
New Fan
Posts: 16
|
Post by mat1 on Jan 7, 2024 11:50:07 GMT
From what we've heard is we offered 100k but you want 200/250k
Personally think 100k is too much but we're desperate due to injurys and that will hold its weight.
If you do end up keeping him where do you reckon he plays
|
|
|
|
Post by chipbarm on Jan 7, 2024 11:52:32 GMT
From what we've heard is we offered 100k but you want 200/250k Personally think 100k is too much but we're desperate due to injurys and that will hold its weight. If you do end up keeping him where do you reckon he plays Based on yesterday's formation probably left sided attacker in a 433 or behind the striker in a 4231 |
|
|
|
Post by je85 on Jan 7, 2024 13:40:13 GMT
Firstly - and I think this needs saying, he is a Salford City Player. The entitled fan base of Stockport County and whoever in their web team wrote that snivelling snippet on the website should remember we are not here to be some sort of feeder club to this weird divine right they seem to have towards promotion. They are worse than Mickey Mouse and Wrexham.
He is 24 and at this point in his career based on the last 6months £150-250k with 6months left on his deal is what Salford would be expected to pay if the boot was on the other foot. I have found Stockport and their fans constant commenting on Salford socials and this forum on Bailey and even KR’s Red yesterday embarrassing. The club has never stood in Bailey’s way of getting games, he has got a poor injury record considering his availability last season but to my knowledge the loan to Stockport was very agreeable for the benefit of the player.
As yesterday proved we are in the green shoots of a very different situation to the summer in the building and I imagine the decision will come down to the player. If he spoke to KR yesterday, potentially Nicky Butt also and feels he wants to give it a go, it will be no doubt welcomed because we are short of bodies. If he wants to go a be part of a promotion push fine - but pay the fee. I keep being told they can afford it, but this rhetoric Stockport fans are peddling of a ‘Free Odin’ type scenario needs nipping in the back side.
|
|
mat1
New Fan
Posts: 16
|
Post by mat1 on Jan 7, 2024 15:59:19 GMT
Firstly - and I think this needs saying, he is a Salford City Player. The entitled fan base of Stockport County and whoever in their web team wrote that snivelling snippet on the website should remember we are not here to be some sort of feeder club to this weird divine right they seem to have towards promotion. They are worse than Mickey Mouse and Wrexham. He is 24 and at this point in his career based on the last 6months £150-250k with 6months left on his deal is what Salford would be expected to pay if the boot was on the other foot. I have found Stockport and their fans constant commenting on Salford socials and this forum on Bailey and even KR’s Red yesterday embarrassing. The club has never stood in Bailey’s way of getting games, he has got a poor injury record considering his availability last season but to my knowledge the loan to Stockport was very agreeable for the benefit of the player. As yesterday proved we are in the green shoots of a very different situation to the summer in the building and I imagine the decision will come down to the player. If he spoke to KR yesterday, potentially Nicky Butt also and feels he wants to give it a go, it will be no doubt welcomed because we are short of bodies. If he wants to go a be part of a promotion push fine - but pay the fee. I keep being told they can afford it, but this rhetoric Stockport fans are peddling of a ‘Free Odin’ type scenario needs nipping in the back side. I agree with you shouldn't be bowing down to us or be any sort of charity. Bailey has had a good 6 months but he's no where near 200k. If he were then he'd be over 500k if he had 2 or 3 year contract. Going back him having a good 6 months I think most would say he's had a very average 18 months For me I'd say 100k would be good money for you to receive for him but I think we should be paying 5 figures. Just opinions though |
|
|
|
Post by odell86 on Jan 8, 2024 9:25:04 GMT
How great that a club can keep their fans updated |
|
|
|
Post by alanb on Jan 8, 2024 11:47:48 GMT
Only on a 'Need-to-know basis', eh.  |
|
|
|
Post by Chris P. Bacon on Jan 8, 2024 13:10:42 GMT
He looked sharp in pre-season and I expected him to play some part. But maybe Wood and him didn't get on and that could change. With our injuries, we need every player we can, as long as they want to play of course.
|
|
|
|
Post by chipbarm on Jan 9, 2024 18:34:30 GMT
Gone to Stockport for an undisclosed fee
|
|
|
|
Post by tangerinedream on Jan 9, 2024 18:56:27 GMT
Gone to Stockport for an undisclosed fee |
|
|
|
Post by Chris P. Bacon on Jan 9, 2024 18:56:28 GMT
Gone to Stockport for an undisclosed fee I hope we don’t regret that. |
|
|
|
Post by chipbarm on Jan 9, 2024 19:30:02 GMT
No point keeping a player who didn't want to be here and being honest he didn't offer much while he was at Salford
|
|
